A black coffee cup sits on a wooden table next to a laptop in a cozy, warmly lit indoor setting with blurred lights and greenery in the background.

Communication Breakdown

Is “TMI Syndrome” disengaging your sales force?

Information is power until it isn’t. For many sales organizations, communication has become a flood. Too much, too scattered, too impersonal. Our global research shows that “TMI Syndrome” (too much information) is one of the biggest engagement killers in sales today.

Below are the six most common communication challenges identified by our panel, paired with proven strategies to solve them.

1. Misaligned strategy and priorities

When sales teams don’t understand the bigger picture, engagement crumbles. Employees who believe leadership has a compelling vision are 13.2x more likely to be highly engaged. Yet 70% of sales employees say they receive conflicting messages from their employer.

Fix it: Align every communication to clear goals.

Employees who say leadership communicates clearly and concisely are 9.6x more likely to be engaged. Use personalized, data-driven scorecards to track goal progress and tie communications directly to performance.


– Matt Givand, VP of Communications, BI WORLDWIDE


2. Information overload or underload

26% of salespeople say they receive communication too frequently, while others say they receive none at all. 63% report feeling overwhelmed by information, higher than the 58% reported by non-sales employees.

Fix it: Cut the clutter.

Streamline communications through curated enablement platforms and brief, purposeful updates. Meet salespeople where they already are in the tools and channels they actually use.


– BI WORLDWIDE + ProHabits Partnership


3. Lack of feedback loops

Top-down communication is a one-way street, and it kills engagement. Employees who feel their ideas are taken seriously are:

  • 11.5x more likely to be highly engaged.
  • 7.4x more likely to be committed.
  • 10.7x more likely to be inspired.

Yet 40% of sales employees say leaders don’t understand the typical employee.

Fix it: Build structured feedback systems like listening sessions, pulse surveys, and CRM insight reviews.


– Quantum Workplaceii


And remember: when managers provide honest, constructive feedback, employees are 9.1x more likely to be highly engaged and 9x more likely to be inspired.

4. Inconsistent messaging across teams

When teams interpret leadership messages differently, culture fractures. Employees who experience strong teamwork are:

  • 10x more likely to be engaged.
  • 8.9x more likely to be inspired.

Fix it: Standardize internal playbooks and communication guidelines.

Consistent, repeatable messaging across all channels ensures teams tell the same story to customers and to each other.

5. Emotional disconnect

Sales is a pressure cooker. When leadership communication feels cold or corporate, it erodes trust. Employees who trust leadership are 11.9x more likely to be engaged and 10.9x more likely to be inspired.

Fix it: Lead with authenticity.

Empathetic, transparent communication builds trust, especially in tough times. When employees hear honesty from leaders, they’re 8.3x more likely to feel inspired.

And never underestimate the power of recognition. When employees hear “You did a great job,” they’re 8.7x more likely to be highly engaged and 7.7x more likely to feel inspired.

6. Poor use of communication channels

Over-reliance on email or static meetings leaves messages lost in translation.

Fix it: Match the medium to the message.

Use short videos, Slack updates, and rich-media messages to keep salespeople informed in real time.


– Matt Givand, VP of Communications, BI WORLDWIDE


An interview focused on behavioral science and the human element

Dr. Kurt Nelson, behavioral strategist and long-time BI WORLDWIDE partner, has worked with global sales organizations to make communication more effective and more human. We asked him his thoughts on the challenges of communication with salespeople.

Here’s a summary of that interview.

Q: In your work with sales organizations and their compensation plans for sellers, what are you seeing as the major challenges?

Many of the organizations we work with struggle to ensure that sales representatives truly buy into the goals that are allocated to them. We find a recurring disconnect: salespeople often perceive their goals as unfair, inaccurate, or out of reach. When goals are not seen as both achievable and fair, salespeople lose trust in their incentive compensation plan, decreasing motivation and performance.

Another significant challenge is balancing a “pay-for-performance” philosophy with the reality that sales results are influenced by many factors outside of an individual’s control such as market shifts, pricing decisions, access constraints, or territory dynamics. This ongoing tension sparks debate around whether, and to what degree, incentive plans should include a “safety net,” such as a minimum earnings floor. Too little protection risks disengagement and burnout, while too much can dilute the motivational impact of pay-for-performance models.

One last challenge that we are witnessing is the rise in uncertainty, felt both at the leadership level and among front-line employees. Leaders are navigating shifting economic conditions, regulatory changes, and unpredictable market dynamics that are more chaotic than ever. Meanwhile, employees are not only impacted by these external forces but are also grappling with how the organization responds. For many, this translates into concerns about job stability and future prospects. This uncertainty drives increased stress, burnout, and a sense of languishing that is higher than we’ve seen in years past.

Q: How can behavioral sciences help with these challenges?

Understanding how the brain processes goals and the emotional impact those goals can have helps companies to communicate them in a more effective manner. Behavioral science research on goal setting and fairness shows that people are more motivated when goals are framed as challenging yet attainable, and when the process of how those goals are set is transparent.

This means that companies should not only focus on what the targets are, but also how they are explained. Clear communication, with a rationale for why goals are structured a certain way, builds trust even if the salesperson doesn’t “like” the number. Goals presented in a way that emphasizes progress, mastery, and opportunity trigger very different motivational responses than goals presented as punitive quotas. The way leaders tell the story of a plan by using concrete milestones, visual aids, and examples of past success changes how salespeople see the goals and thus respond to them.

Insights from loss aversion and psychological safety help organizations navigate the safety net debate. Humans are more sensitive to losses than equivalent gains, which means that plans designed with too much downside risk can drive fear rather than performance. At the same time, a modest earnings floor can preserve psychological safety, ensuring that salespeople stay engaged and willing to take smart risks instead of playing it safe.

Finally, behavioral science provides insights into how people deal with uncertainty and stress. We can provide behaviorally based tools and training for leaders to help their team (as well as themselves) handle and respond to this uncertainty in a way that reduces stress and anxiety.

Q: How have business outcomes been impacted as a result of your work?

Our communication work around incentive plans has improved how well the field understands their IC plans as well as the perception of those plans. We have seen understanding increase in some instances over 40% and overall satisfaction with a plan increase up to 15%. Those changes in understanding and perception lead to improved motivation and performance.

Q: Anything else you would like to add?

While uncertainty has always been a component in any business, the levels that we are hearing and the subsequent anxiety we’ve seen over the past year have skyrocketed. The impact that this will have on organizations is still being played out, but we feel that it will be significant.

When communication is clear, authentic, and continuous, it builds trust, drives performance, and keeps sales teams focused on what matters.

Key takeaways:

  • Misalignment and TMI are silent performance killers.
  • Personalization, clarity, and feedback loops transform communication from noise to impact.
  • Recognition and authenticity humanize leadership messages.
  • Applying behavioral science to sales communications improves understanding, motivation, and trust.

Hear from our expert

Ben Drake, Creative Director, Communications

Download a full copy of The New Rules of Engagement® 2025 Global Employee Inspiration Report.